Death, Badness, and the Impossibility of Experience. Creator. Fischer, John Martin. Bibliographic Citation. Journal of Ethics October-December; 1(4): Download Citation on ResearchGate | Death, Badness, and the Impossibility of Experience | Some have They contend that nothing can be a bad for an individual unless the individual is able to experience it as bad. John Martin Fischer. John Martin Fischer’s research works with citations and reads, including: University University Professor Lecture: Near-Death Experiences: The Stories They Tell Death, Badness, and the Impossibility of Experience.
|Published (Last):||13 February 2008|
|PDF File Size:||2.39 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.26 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
I would suggest that such an account must make use of devices similar to the two key elements in my account of guidance control: This single location in Australian Capital Territory: Cognitive Science with Content. I contend that guidance-control is the freedom-relevant condition. We here employ certain Parfit-style thought-experiments to motivate the idea that it is rational to care especially about future pleasures.
Ben Impossibiilty – unknown. Once we grant that one is paradise-bound and that each moment of her everlasting existence in paradise will be better than any moment of her life before death, impossibi,ity becomes readily apparent that the hhe belief that death can be bad for the one who has died gives rise to a puzzle. Semicompatibilism is the doctrine that causal determinism is compatible with moral responsibility, even if casual determinism rules out freedom to do otherwise.
To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.
Introduction In the extant philosophical literature on how death might be bad for the one who has died, death—the state of one who has died—is typically assumed to be a permanent experiential imposssibility. This is derived from your idea that the value of moral responsibility is connected to the value of exhibiting freedom.
And I do think it is a beautiful and elegant theory. Despite the main claims made by proponents of the Epicurean view, therefore, tbe puzzle about how death can be bad for the one who has died can be solved while maintaining the assumption that death is a permanent experiential blank.
John M. Fischer
Christopher Belshaw – unknown. If an agent with regulative control does Badnesw, he or she could have refrained from doing X and done some Y instead. Corballis – – Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 3: While she checks on your status, it is clear that you prefer to have the pleasure tomorrow. On their view, a later birth can deprive us of pleasures just as an earlier death can, but it is rational dxperience care about the latter pleasures and not to care about the former.
Mikel Burley – – Inquiry: Yes, my account of guidance control has impoasibility virtue in my opinion of being compatible with causal determination and also with the lack of causal determination.
To see the force of this puzzle, a bit more needs to be said about what paradise is often taken to be. So why is my attitude rational and defensible? Open to the public ; Journal of Ethics, 18, Summary In this collection of experlence on the metaphysical issues pertaining to death, the meaning of life, and freedom of the will, the author argues against the Epicureans that death can be a bad thing for the individual who dies.
Similarly, I think it is desirable to have a way of engaging more productively with the moral responsibility skeptics.
Log In Sign Up.
International Journal for Ajd of Religion, 9, In Defense of Epicureanism About Death. We were unable to find this edition in any bookshop we are able to search. The second type of solution maintains that death can be bad for the paradise-bound because it can deprive her of certain goods, which allows those who are attracted to this type of solution to adopt the deprivation account of death’s badness.
The first broad type of solution, which is the subject of this section, simply denies that death can be bad for the paradise-bound. It seems to me that to suppose otherwise might be to buy into a misleading metaphor—the metaphor of the library of books with a large but finite collection. He defends the claim that something can be a bad thing-a misfortune-for an individual, even if he never experiences it as bad and even if he does not any longer exist.
Notes Includes bibliographical references and index.