Buy Foma Fomadon R09 ( ml) featuring Monochrome Negative Film Developer, High Acutance / Edge Contrast High Dilution: to Review Foma. I just picked up a bottle of fomadon R09 from prophot in paris as a rodinal substitute (i know its back in production, but they didn’t seem to keen. Fomadon R09 is a one-part liquid concentrate to prepare fine-grain, normal- working developer, intended for of all types of black and white negative films.
|Published (Last):||19 February 2016|
|PDF File Size:||20.20 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.43 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Jan 12, 9. But I don’t know if it is the only difference, after the worldwar 2 R09 was made by the east german agfa or orwo and Rodinal was made by west german agfa.
I still have that bottle so it will be interesting to see how and if it still works – bet it does. It’s almost a cult thing. You must log in or sign up to reply here. The R09 part is OK, r009 yes I fomadin tested my densitometer again with the supplied calibrated transmission test card.
Less diluted concentrate produces harder and more coarse-grain negatives, while highly diluted concentrate yields fine-grain negatives with lower contrast.
Commercial restrictions force Maco to sell Rodinal under a different name in this country. In action aside from the differences in dilution I do not find any real difference between R09 and Adonal Rodinal.
Looking at the wet negatives, I do not think there is any problem about the activity of both developers, the negatives are looking fine. It’s 0,65 log D. It’s packed under nitrogen gas in the factory.
Testing developers is a quiet time consuming business. Your name or email address: Rodinal brown, R09 dark brown like Coke, this is also the color when you buy this last mentioned developer new. Whatever is the color of your Rodinal: My style of photography is just that, I’m a photographer not a chemist, so I’m not going to mix up my own. The Foma Fomadon R09 ml is a fine-grain liquid negative film developer. We asked Foma for more detailed info about their developer in combination with other films.
I used 6ml for a 1: Rodinal is yellow when new but going within a year or so to brown. Indeed, the differences are neglectible and in fact almost within the specifications of the densitometer I used to measure things out on the grey card. The bottle ml Fomadon R09 was almost full. I have used 1; stand development with fp4 with greta results.
Working solution diluted in this manner can be used for up to 6 hr from preparation. I’m using R09 of some sort.
Even if you use painkiller like Dead Link Removed who is a site member. I’ve got some on the shelf in the fomadln, but haven’t tried any of it yet.
Photo by equal arch. However working with MG papers only this step will be within 1 grade to compensate this. Fomadpn 12, 8. It says, APH09 at 1: Jan 13, I was just wondering if rr09 are other formulations out there that I could purchase that might be closer to the Rodinal formula?
FilmDev | Recipes & dev times using Developer Foma Fomadon R09
Well the rest in the 4 y. Foma Fomadon R09 ml. All mentioned values correspond values printed in the tables of commercial packing of all three developers and at the last time have not been proved. Carbonate is less soluble and crystallizes. This article and examples must show that also in practice. Can I interpret your results to mean that R09 needs less time in development to reach the same density, or a higher dilution compared to Rodinal?
Does anybody here foomadon Fomadon R09? I use the same dilutions and times as for Agfa Rodinal and get good results. Overview Discussions Photos Members Map.
Based on printing some 16x16s, Efke is my new standard film, and in Rodinal looks very nice. Do you already have an account? Fascinating how the results can be of this developer: You have to watch out now: Wetting agent Amaloco H But I can ask them.