Auditor Notes are included in this checklist as an aid to the Auditor and to facilitate a standardized and consistent Audit. Auditor Notes fall into four categories. Operational Safety Audit Program (IOSA) is an in- . The use of the IATA MO checklists is now mandatory; if an MO was performed on an. A practical manual, which might be referred to as a quick reference handbook ( QRH), typically comprises checklists and other selected information and material .

Author: Nigor Zulkijora
Country: Senegal
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Science
Published (Last): 20 April 2017
Pages: 125
PDF File Size: 4.66 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.92 Mb
ISBN: 324-3-30008-994-2
Downloads: 32951
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nekasa

Refer to FLT 3.

New IOSA checklists available in IQSMS | ASQS – Intuitive Quality & Safety Management

An acceptable system provides a forward looking capability chfcklist terrain clearance floor protection in areas of operations and surrounding airports of intended use. Many operators refer to this training course as Basic Company Indoctrination.

The specification of this provision is applicable to flight operations personnel and is not restricted only to flight crew. Instructors, evaluators and line check airmen typically attend a standardization meeting at least once a year. The intent of this provision is to ensure a pilot who is required to communicate with air traffic control in English, periodically demonstrates a sufficient level of English language proficiency to ensure effective communication during the performance of duties.

Such corrections may be applied manually by the flight crew e. Training and, when applicable, an evaluation in the specified normal and non-normal procedures and maneuvers is applicable to all pilot crew members. The specifications of this provision are minimum requirements and might be exceeded by requirements of the State or other applicable authorities.

Such training may be achieved through the use of common learning ioss contained in respective training curricula, and does not necessarily require the physical presence of flight crew members and FOO personnel at a common training location. This does not preclude, however, an OEM or operator from procedurally addressing critical actions in the checklists themselves.


IOSA Checklist – Aviation Quality Services

Factors that may affect landing performance include, but are not limited to: The specifications in item i permit an operator, in accordance with operational requirements approved or accepted by the Authority, to establish stabilization heights lower than ft.

The intent of this provision is to ensure that resource management issues of mutual concern to both FOO personnel and flight crew members are addressed during initial and recurrent training.

The surfaces specified in item iii include: Refer to the IRM for the definition of Outsourcing. This provision is ipsa if a process exists for the introduction into checmlist training program of each specification that results from the coordination processes required by FLT 1.

Such analysis shall take into account: IOSA provides a common set of audit standards that are centrally managed, continuously updated, and checkliat implemented by experts and industry professionals. Such coordination processes occur: Minutes of standardization meetings are distributed to instructors, evaluators and line check airmen. Engraving metal foil and photographic film are obsolete recording media and are no longer acceptable for use in FDRs.

The term applicable authorities refers to authorities that have jurisdiction over international operations conducted by an operator over the high seas or the territory of a state that is other than the State of the Operator.

An aircraft type-specific training course would typically address any cabin or supernumerary compartment actions to be taken during normal, abnormal or emergency situations. The specification of this provision ensures flight crews that operate in airspace s with different rules have those differences explained in the OM.

The intent of this provision is for an operator to require a landing performance assessment under conditions distinct from those presumed at time of dispatch. Such flexibility is normally incorporated in the training and evaluation program to allow for latitude in the trainee scheduling process.

The specifications of this provision would typically apply to periodic audits of the training organization and program, whether training is conducted by the operator checcklist outsourced to an external service provider.


Refer to guidance associated with ORG 2. Such evaluation applies to each operating member of the flight crew, as required by the AFM, whose duties require communication in English with ATC. The responsibility of ensuring that electronic navigation data is assessed for integrity and is compatible with its intended application rests with the operator. Mark Tischler presented an overview of activities in flight control at.

Such briefing shall address and include, as a minimum: This provision, however, contains specifications only related to the use of such doors when installed. Such guidance and procedures shall be in accordance with FLT 3. Such process shall ensure: Such course would typically address: Items readily available in other documentation, obtained from another acceptable source or irrelevant to the type of operation, may be omitted from the OFP.

Required onboard manuals and documents may be carried onboard by the flight crew.

IOSA Checklist – Aviation Quality Services

The specification in item i may be satisfied by a process, approved or accepted by the State, that: However, when such recurrent training ilsa completed within the final 3 months of the month validity period, the new validity period may extend from the date on which the recurrent training was completed until 24 months from the expiry date of the current validity period. The Training Iosaa shall be approved or accepted by the State and the content of the Training Manual shall, as a minimum, be in accordance with specifications in Table 2.

The evaluation cycles specified in items i and ii of this provision may also be adjusted in accordance with State requirements that ensure each flight crew member undergoes training and, checklidt applicable, an evaluation at least every 6 or 12 calendar months, as applicable.